Archive for the ‘Arne Duncan’ Category

The Problem We All Live With

Tuesday, May 25th, 2010

I was waiting for my son’s transition IEP (Individual Education Program) meeting in the office of his new school (he will be leaving a pre-school special ed program next week and entering a general ed kindergarten class in August) when I saw hanging from the wall the Norman Rockwell illustration of a girl with a black eye sitting outside the principal’s office. She looked dazed and happy, like she probably won the fight. My wife and I were also about to fight, having disagreed with the school district’s original offer of FAPE (Free Appropriate Public Education) and written a letter to the Special Ed Director explaining our concerns. We had recently won in a fair hearing versus Regional Center (our son had been denied services there and a judge overturned their decision) so we were feeling pretty scrappy. We knew that we could prevail. Part of that confidence was due to the excellent legal representation we were able to secure, but more important was the fact that we could fight at all, that the system allowed for appeal.

If our son’s new school were a charter it could lock us out. So long. Don’t let the door hit you in the behind. There would be no recourse because, though funded by public money, charters can pick and choose who they serve. Although Secretary of Education Arne Duncan claims that charters are a guarantee of civil rights, they are the exact opposite. They deny what federal law requires, that all public schools treat all students equally regardless of race, belief or disability. Imagine how the public would react today if a privatized school turned away the little girl in another Rockwell illustration, The Problem We All Live With. The parents of six-year-old Ruby Bridges volunteered their daughter to test the new integration laws in 1960. She became the first black child to attend an all-white public school. From Wikipedia:

The court-ordered first day of integrated schools in New Orleans, November 14, 1960, was commemorated by Norman Rockwell in the painting The Problem We All Live With. As Bridges describes it, “Driving up I could see the crowd, but living in New Orleans, I actually thought it was Mardi Gras. There was a large crowd of people outside of the school. They were throwing things and shouting, and that sort of goes on in New Orleans at Mardi Gras.” Former marshal Charles Burks later recalled, “She showed a lot of courage. She never cried. She didn’t whimper. She just marched along like a little soldier, and we’re all very proud of her.”

Can you imagine what would happen today if a charter school turned her away? How is turning away children with disabilities any different? The problem we live with is inequality, a problem that Secretary Duncan will doubtless rectify, because in this country we defend the rights of children.

Or do we?

Okay, All You Slacker Teachers in Hooper Bay, Alaska, You’re Fired!

Wednesday, April 14th, 2010

But if they were who would replace them?

Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, reminded Mr. Duncan of that visit in asking about his school-turnaround strategies, given that the Hooper Bay school has been on the federal list of failing schools for years, she said.

Three of the administration’s four strategies would involve firing educators, which Ms. Murkowski said would be impractical in Hooper Bay.

“There’s no place to live, there’s no running water,” she said. “These are not conditions most teachers will be able to handle.”

“We already can’t keep good people there,” she added.

Concerns echoed in the Washington Post today by a ranking Republican Mike Enzi:

“I am very concerned that requiring school districts to use one of the four school turnaround models for schools identified for school improvement will adversely affect rural and frontier schools,” Enzi, ranking Republican on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, said at a hearing. He added: “Let me be clear that I am not proposing to give rural and frontier schools a free pass. Strategies mandated from Washington will simply not solve the problems facing these schools.”

Are you listening, President Obama?

No More Tiers!

Friday, March 26th, 2010

Watch this expose of Chicago’s two tier system of education.

Another Reason to Save Public Schools

Thursday, March 11th, 2010

Students with disabilities and students without disabilities must be placed in the same setting, to the maximum extent appropriate to the education needs of the students with disabilities.

So states the Department of Education’s definition of FAPE (Free and Appropriate Public Education). With charters sucking up so much oxygen, neighborhood schools, according to Diane Ravitch, will become educational ghettos for the special ed kids that the charters reject.  How can students with disabilities and students without disabilities be placed in the same setting if there are no longer places where both kinds of kids can mix? Food for thought, one would hope, for the likes of Secretary of Duncan and other champions of student civil rights.

The photo, by the way, is of the wheelchair of one of my third graders, a boy who came to America for its great public schools.

Voice of Reason

Friday, March 5th, 2010

Please everyone go out and buy Diane Ravitch’s new book and read the chapter entitled “The Billionaire Boys’ Club” if you want to know who’s driving national education policy.  Hint: it isn’t Obama or Duncan.  Below comes from her piece in the Huffington Post.  And watch for her  blog “Bridging Differences” in EdWeek.

It would be good if our nation’s education leaders recognized that teachers are not solely responsible for student test scores. Other influences matter, including the students’ effort, the family’s encouragement, the effects of popular culture, and the influence of poverty. A blogger called “Mrs. Mimi” wrote the other day that we fire teachers because “we can’t fire poverty.” Since we can’t fire poverty, we can’t fire students, and we can’t fire families, all that is left is to fire teachers.

This strategy of closing schools and firing the teachers is mean and punitive. And it is ultimately pointless. It solves no problem. It opens up a host of new problems. It satisfies the urge to purge. But it does nothing at all for the students.

Mr. Secretary, Have Pity on the Working Man

Thursday, March 4th, 2010

“States would measure school performance on the basis of progress in getting all students, including groups of students who are members of minority groups, low-income, English learners, and students with disabilities, on track to college- and career-readiness, as well as closing achievement gaps and improving graduation rates for high schools,” the secretary said.

What Secretary Duncan means by “college- and career-ready” may reside in the hyphens, which link college readiness and career readiness on one hand, separate them on the other. Does doing away with the AYP (Annual Yearly Progress) mean that children like my five-year-old will have more choice, that he will be able to pursue college OR career education, depending upon his interests, abilities, and needs? Or does it mean some other set of rigid standards, trading one cookie cutter for another?

Whatever he means, should he be holding the nation’s children hostage until he gets what he wants (teachers linked to test scores, the privatization schools)? As Representative Mark Souder, Republican of Indiana pointed out at the Secretary’s recent appearance before Congress:

“In Indiana, the budget is tight, the governor has cut back, we see schools laying off teachers, we see them closing down schools,” Mr. Souder said. “And we come out here and we hear how we’re going to spend money this, spend money that. There’s an increasing disconnect between Washington and the grass roots.”