Talk to You Later-Notes to My Son: Last Day of School
Podcast: Play in new window | Download
Came across this great op-ed about SB 955 and the damage it will do to California public education. Give it a read!
Reject Huff’s bill
State Sen. Huff’s bill to repeal public school teacher seniority from district and county employment contracts is disappointing for many reasons. Here are three of them:
First, this bill seeks to pacify newly credentialed interns who are angry about the paucity of entry level teaching jobs in this economic recession of 2009-10. The real agenda of SB 955, however, is an attack on California’s tenure laws in the education code.
Teachers currently serve the longest probation period of any profession in California, three years. Teacher performance evaluations are the responsibility of school site principals. Probationary and tenured teachers are employed individually by collective bargaining contracts, the terms and conditions of which are defined by local board policies and state statutes. Could it be that SB 955 also seeks to undermine public contracts?
Second, where students and learning are concerned, there is no substitute for an experienced, well-trained teacher who possesses an institutional memory for policies, practices, and methods that work.
Now, despite their energy and optimism, “rookie” professionals tend to depend on trial and error, which is, in itself, a learning process. The NCLB fraud, however, permits no room for trial and error of anything in the classroom. Standardized tests have become the God!
Further, few wise observers would doubt that the most qualified, experienced teachers should be assigned to instruct slow learners, and so-called “underachievers.”
Finally, if the premise of Sen. Huff’s bill were applied to our armed service branches, then buck privates, corporals and first class airmen would be running the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Sounds absurd doesn’t it? Maybe Sen. Huff needs to resign and apply for a job at Wal-Mart.
JEFFERY GRIFFITH
Fontana
But if they were who would replace them?
Senator Lisa Murkowski, Republican of Alaska, reminded Mr. Duncan of that visit in asking about his school-turnaround strategies, given that the Hooper Bay school has been on the federal list of failing schools for years, she said.
Three of the administration’s four strategies would involve firing educators, which Ms. Murkowski said would be impractical in Hooper Bay.
“There’s no place to live, there’s no running water,” she said. “These are not conditions most teachers will be able to handle.”
“We already can’t keep good people there,” she added.
Concerns echoed in the Washington Post today by a ranking Republican Mike Enzi:
“I am very concerned that requiring school districts to use one of the four school turnaround models for schools identified for school improvement will adversely affect rural and frontier schools,” Enzi, ranking Republican on the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, said at a hearing. He added: “Let me be clear that I am not proposing to give rural and frontier schools a free pass. Strategies mandated from Washington will simply not solve the problems facing these schools.”
Are you listening, President Obama?
Teachers need to believe that those at the top understand the situation they face each day and are supportive, even as they push and prod. But teachers are also jumpy, irascible, and feisty agents in their own right — a fact that too many superintendents come to understand too late.
Larry Cuban is another powerful voice in the education reform debate. Like Diane Ravitch, he is an historian who knows how ethereal and damaging reform efforts can be.